<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: Bell Etiquette - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: Bell Etiquette - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 19:37:47 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>559 on "Bell Etiquette"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5071#post-53816</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>559</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53816@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Had a intersting encounter tonight on the way home... started with a bell. Unfortunately not a song.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Iam cycling through the closed section of Russell Road behind a pedestrian, cyclist behind me.&#60;br /&#62;
The pedestrian stops, I start to pass, cyclist behind me starts ringing their bell 4 or 5 times. This concerned me in two aspects, firstly the pedestrian may react to the bell and move in my way, secondly was something wrong with my bike, lights or something. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Consequently I stopped and challenged him on the number of rings, once he had taken out his earphones, tried to explain my point, which was ignored/dismissed as in his opinion I had a bad day. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;For my part I apologise for the tone of our subsequent discussion.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;My main point of this tale, is that a bell ring should only be used for blockages or potentially hazardous move by a pedestrian, and should only be one or two rings.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Iam I right in this approach?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
