<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: brake booster - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: brake booster - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 18:08:46 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>mfcity on "Mudguard choices"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14434#post-181665</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mfcity</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">181665@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I was wondering whether people more experienced with mudguards could offer some advice.  The only type I've used in the past are the Crud road ones that attach with elastic p-clip things, on a bike without eyelets.  They're fairly easy to mount, but on the flimsy side.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm looking for full mudguards, first of all for an MTB for utility riding, with 26*2.1 tyres and dropout eyelets, as well as brake holes and chain-stay bridge (though still hoping to find a brake booster to bridge the long clearance on a 100mm rigid fork). Leaning towards SKS chromoplasts, as they seem straightforward and functional.&#60;br /&#62;
The other mudguard aim is for an &#60;u&#62;old&#60;/u&#62; Super Galaxy that just fits its 38mm tyres, for longer rides.  Here, I'm torn between glowing reports of aluminium 'guards (which might make the bike look prettier and more theft-prone than it should be, really) and the down-to-earth rationale of SKS.  I think for both 'guards, being quiet and durable is more important than lightweight.&#60;br /&#62;
Any recommendations about these, or if someone has a suitable set to sell, would be appreciated.  Thanks!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
