<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: campaign advert value - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: campaign advert value - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:36:17 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>fimm on "Is there really no value at all to an advertising campaign?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=10806#post-119694</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fimm</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">119694@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;... or have I not quite understood PoP correctly? Are they actually saying that the money would be better spent on infrastructure, or that adverts are a good way of being seen to do &#34;something&#34; rather than actually doing anything?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We get campaigns about drink driving, and there was one about driving and texting, and &#34;think bike&#34; for the motorcyclists, and I saw one on the TV the other day that was about thinking about what sort of attitudes to other road users you are teaching your child. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm just wondering if anyone knows of any evidence for the effectiveness of this kind of thing? The drink driving ones have been going on for years, and I think in that time attitudes to it have changed. I know there's also a lot of enforcement goes into the drink driving campaigns too.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
