<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: humor - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: humor - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 10:06:37 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>ruggtomcat on "The Rules"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=1382#post-12969</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ruggtomcat</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12969@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.velominati.com/blog/the-rules/&#34;&#62;the rules&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;has this come up? my fav is Rule 12:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The minimum number of bikes one should own is three.  The correct number is n+1, where n is the number of bikes currently owned.  This equation may also be re-written as s-1, where s is the number of bikes owned that would result in separation from your partner.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
