<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: Scheme work - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: Scheme work - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:09:53 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>KarenJS on "Cycle to work scheme - is it worth it?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=12864#post-154743</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>KarenJS</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">154743@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I've heard a lot of good things about cycle to work and the savings it makes, but looking into it a bit more I'm wondering if it's actually worth it? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The organisation buys the bike, you effectively pay it back over a certain time period, but at the end of that it's not yours. So if you want it, and the organisation is willing to sell it, then despite having paid it off you would end up paying an additional cost and may as well have paid the tax and bought outright in the first instance?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Or the organisation lets you keep it but it's still not yours, and if you leave then technically you have to pay the balance but leave the bike....  Is this right or have I got the wrong end of the stick?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
