<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: smoke mirrors shenanigans - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: smoke mirrors shenanigans - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 20:28:19 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Morningsider on "Scottish Budget 2022-23"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20807#post-357484</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 19:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Morningsider</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">357484@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;It's that time of year again.  The Scottish Government trumpets a £150m &#60;a href=&#34;https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-budget-2022-23/documents/&#34;&#62;budget for active travel&#60;/a&#62; in 2022-23.  A dig into the figures shows:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;£113.75m for active travel infrastructure&#60;br /&#62;
£12.3m for revenue spend - promotion, cycle training etc.&#60;br /&#62;
£23.9m Cycling, Walking and Safer Routes - cash paid directly to local authorities for cycling and walking (and other things - always a bit of a mystery this one).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This is a record annual budget for active travel.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The thing is, the last two budgets have also been annual records. Apart from a couple of high profile projects (South City Way in Glasgow and the like), I'm beginning to doubt that the full allocation is actually being spent.  If it is, I have no idea what it is being spent on.  Is it all being hosed away on upgrading paths in the middle of nowhere, so as not to upset any drivers?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Also, should the Scottish Government really be channelling over a £100m a year through a third party (Sustrans)?  I think the time for that is over.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
