<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: sponsored ride - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: sponsored ride - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 12:28:46 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Smudge on "Charity Ride Fatigue ?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2197#post-23176</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Smudge</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23176@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Anyone else getting charity ride fatigue? :-/&#60;br /&#62;
I am doing one particularly big sponsored ride this year, my friends, relatives and colleagues will take enough convincing to give me money for this (as they know I enjoy cycling). So why do so many accessible and interesting sounding rides &#60;em&#62;have&#60;/em&#62; to push the sponsored ride thing? :-(&#60;br /&#62;
I appreciate they are good causes and all, but surely you could take a moderate entry fee, give us a nice run in return and make a modest gain? If I skim through the ads in Cycling plus it seems to be a never-ending stream of charity this (&#60;em&#62;just&#60;/em&#62; raise £X,XXX for us and you can...), sponsored that, doubtless good causes but good grief, can someone &#60;em&#62;please&#60;/em&#62; do something original?!?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
