<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: sustainability - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: sustainability - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 12:06:23 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>unhurt on "low-tech cities &#38; why we might want them"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20062#post-321659</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>unhurt</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">321659@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Some really interesting stuff to think on in this article making the case against &#34;smart cities&#34; and in favour of rediscovering old approaches, urban rewilding, sponge cities &#38;amp; symbiosis.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2020/jan/15/the-case-for-making-low-tech-dumb-cities-instead-of-smart-ones&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2020/jan/15/the-case-for-making-low-tech-dumb-cities-instead-of-smart-ones&#60;/a&#62; &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;blockquote&#62;Saxe pithily calls for redirecting some of our energy toward building “excellent dumb cities.” She’s not anti-technology, it’s just that she thinks smart cities may be unnecessary. “For many of our challenges, we don’t need new technologies or new ideas; we need the will, foresight and courage to use the best of the old ideas,” she says.&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
