<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: VED - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Tag: VED - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 18:58:11 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>unhurt on "environmentally backwards changes to VED?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=17364#post-241257</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>unhurt</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">241257@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Via a friend on FB: &#34;Here's a question Facebookers - who else was aware of the changes to VED (road tax) that will affect new cars from the 1st April? Basically they're tearing up the whole 'the more the car pollutes the more you pay' with a system that will cost every single band the same and the only exception will be cars that produce zero emissions or cars over £40,000 (which will end up costing you a whopping £450 vs £140 for five years and then it's back to £140.) &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So as of the 1st April you're as well getting the most powerful and polluting engined car you can for £39,999.99 as you'll be paying the same VED as a low pollution hybrid! Doesn't seem very environmentally focused to me...&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Only applies to new cars - but as he commented later, &#34;Yep - apparently far too many people were buying low emission cars and the VED take was dropping.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;SArgh. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Is this right? If so, regressive taxation agogo...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
