<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Blink/Steady: the world&#039;s most expensive (&#38; unecessary)  rear bike light?</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Blink/Steady: the world&#039;s most expensive (&#38; unecessary)  rear bike light?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 23:35:49 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>kaputnik on "Blink/Steady: the world&#039;s most expensive (&#38; unecessary)  rear bike light?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=11659#post-133353</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133353@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;A neat and entirely unneccessary way to package a light. When it fails, you throw your seatpost out? No thanks.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Focus on "Blink/Steady: the world&#039;s most expensive (&#38; unecessary)  rear bike light?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=11659#post-133349</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Focus</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133349@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;You're right, I think I skipped the bit about photo sensors whilst rolling my eyes as I read the article! ;-)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>EddieD on "Blink/Steady: the world&#039;s most expensive (&#38; unecessary)  rear bike light?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=11659#post-133241</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>EddieD</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133241@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;It has light sensors instead of on/off switches.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Still not worth the money...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Focus on "Blink/Steady: the world&#039;s most expensive (&#38; unecessary)  rear bike light?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=11659#post-133231</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 03:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Focus</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">133231@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.bikeradar.com/commuting/news/article/blinksteady-the-worlds-most-expensive-rear-bike-light-39034/?CPN=RSS&#38;amp;SOURCE=BRROADNEWS&#34;&#62;Blink/Steady: the world's most expensive rear bike light?&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Another over-engineered product that actually reduces its worth rather than enhancing it.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;£115 and you need to remove your seatpost if you want to change from flashing to constant. And really, do you need an accelerometer to switch it on? Surely that means it is on even in daylight unless there's an unmentioned on/off switch. besides, I like the choice not to fit lights when I know I won't be needing them. I'd rather not be regularly loosening and tightening a carbon frame and seatpost.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
