<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Why does cycling thrive in some cities and not in others?&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Why does cycling thrive in some cities and not in others?&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 07:40:18 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>gkgk on "&#34;Why does cycling thrive in some cities and not in others?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=11908#post-137401</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gkgk</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137401@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;The answer to that one is pretty obvious - people who live in MK could work anywhere from London to Birmingham to Swindon and points in between. &#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I've never been there but doesn't MK have pretty smooth car infrastructure too, reducing the push factors that add to the pull of nice bikeways etc? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I used to drive 1 mile to Waitrose as there was a quiet road and car parking at each end. Great times!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Charterhall on "&#34;Why does cycling thrive in some cities and not in others?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=11908#post-137384</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Charterhall</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137384@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;It's not just cycling.  For recreation and fitness you can't get any cheaper than walking and running but they too are largely shunned by the lower paid.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;PS Unable to go back to read any comments without taking out a subscription.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nelly on "&#34;Why does cycling thrive in some cities and not in others?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=11908#post-137351</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 20:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nelly</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137351@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Yes, the comments are probably better than the article (if that makes sense).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;And a lot of the commentators echo my thoughts - if it is to work, you need to put the infra in place (i.e. give over certain key routes in town to bike / peds) not just paint on some roads and hope for the best.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The Milton Keynes example is often held up as 'well we give cyclists infra in MK and they still dont cycle much'. The answer to that one is pretty obvious - people who live in MK could work anywhere from London to Birmingham to Swindon and points in between.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "&#34;Why does cycling thrive in some cities and not in others?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=11908#post-137344</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 19:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137344@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/12/economist-explains-12&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/12/economist-explains-12&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Comments &#60;em&#62;worth&#60;/em&#62; reading!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
