<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Could tricks from behavioural science make city cycling safer?&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Could tricks from behavioural science make city cycling safer?&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>crowriver on "&#34;Could tricks from behavioural science make city cycling safer?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=12639#post-149977</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">149977@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;In any case, it's the wrong question. The stats show that city cycling is some of the safest cycling there is, especially away from busy main roads. Somewhat counter-intuitively, it is rural cycling that is more hazardous, especially where there is no alternative to using a fast road. This is all related to the speed at which motor vehicles are travelling. In cities they generally can't go that fast.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>rust on "&#34;Could tricks from behavioural science make city cycling safer?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=12639#post-149970</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rust</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">149970@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think that's very different from hi-viz or flashy lights. Rather than saying look!, look!, look! that light says bicycle!.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I find whenever I come across something unusual or unexpected on the road it takes me a fraction of a second longer to work out what it is*. I see it, my brain sees it, but as it doesn't expect it or hasn't seen it regularly enough it can't autopilot a response and instead requires me to engage with things properly - which takes longer.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;*Obviously I expect bicycles, and obviously I drive in such a way that I can cope with the unexpected, and obviously everyone should drive like that...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Roibeard on "&#34;Could tricks from behavioural science make city cycling safer?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=12639#post-149965</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Roibeard</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">149965@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm with Instography in thinking that this may present only a temporary benefit, but not with him on thinking that we can prevent driving around on autopilot.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It's not that it's impossible to do, but rather that not everyone can expect to be a pilot or a &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.londoncyclist.co.uk/raf-pilot-teach-cyclists/&#34;&#62;fighter pilot&#60;/a&#62; yet society expects anyone to be a driver.  I don't think society will accept driving being done only by the elite, so driving will continue to be done by the distracted amateur with little comprehension of physics.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Actually, re-reading Inst's post, I'm applying a higher standard than simply &#34;active attention&#34;, however I'm not sure we can get to even that stage!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I think we need engineering and fail-safe solutions to avoid the human weak link, not expecting the human to be more aware...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Robert
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "&#34;Could tricks from behavioural science make city cycling safer?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=12639#post-149837</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">149837@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;To answer the question in a single word: no.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Instography on "&#34;Could tricks from behavioural science make city cycling safer?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=12639#post-149835</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Instography</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">149835@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Apart from the extended advertisement for a set of bike lights, which might have a short-term novelty effect, I think the main problem with the article is that it starts from and accepts the assumption that &#34;Drivers are essentially on auto-pilot. The brain is operating on a system one, intuitive level, making snap decisions.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm not sure that's true but even if it were, there is surely only a limited role for compensatory adaptation by other road users. We seem to have reached a stage where the effects of novelty clothing - hi viz - and other types of novelty lighting - blinkies - have worn off so I can't say that I see much long term benefit from this novelty.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;No, I'd rather we didn't accept driving around on autopilot. I'd rather we insisted that driving is a serious business that needs your active attention.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stickman on "&#34;Could tricks from behavioural science make city cycling safer?&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=12639#post-149830</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stickman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">149830@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/apr/22/city-cycling-safety-tricks-behavioural-science&#34;&#62;Link&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I've seen the Brainy Bike Lights mentioned elsewhere.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
