<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Interesting lock advice</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Interesting lock advice</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 02:46:49 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>algo on "Interesting lock advice"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=13295#post-162293</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 12:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>algo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">162293@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;As I was locking my bike up yesterday, an Edinburgh University security man gave me various bits of friendly advice - most of it was predictable and along the lines of my lock not really being sufficient as it is a cable lock. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;My lock is pretty rubbish but it used to defend against opportunistic of my not particularly desirable bike. Previously I had locked it as tightly as possible through both wheels, frame and Sheffield stand. I was in favour of locking as tightly as possible as when it is windy the bike had a tendency to become vertically challenged. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Apparently the easiest opportunistic way to nick a bike (as evidenced by CCTV apparently) with a fairly rubbish lock on a sheffield stand is to use the bike as leverage to forcefully break the lock - providing it is fairly tightly locked up. So I shall in future be trying to defend against this by leaving quite a bit of slack in the lock - then it is much hard to use the bike itself to break the lock.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This may of course be old news to everyone, but I felt it quite useful advice.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
