<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Developers under fire over St Andrew Square plans&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Developers under fire over St Andrew Square plans&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 08:51:44 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>PS on "&#34;Developers under fire over St Andrew Square plans&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=13819#post-170432</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PS</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">170432@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;As far as I can tell &#34;the entirely new modernist frontage with limestone columns and large windows&#34; is the same design they've been touting for several months. At least, that's the one featured in the appendices to the most recent application.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "&#34;Developers under fire over St Andrew Square plans&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=13819#post-170423</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">170423@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm sure the planning committee won't just rubber stamp whatever is put in front of them, regardless of its suitability for the site. They don't have a track record of doing anything like that at all. At all, at all.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>PS on "&#34;Developers under fire over St Andrew Square plans&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=13819#post-170421</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PS</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">170421@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;Bit late?&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Just a tad...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;“The whole site should be reviewed again. It is not a bad building but &#60;strong&#62;pays no regard whatsoever to surrounding buildings&#60;/strong&#62;.”&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Nor did the Scottish Provident building, to be fair.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'll have a look for the plans of this &#34;entirely new modernist frontage with limestone columns and large windows offering views out towards the Forth&#34; that they've lodged when I have a bit of time.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "&#34;Developers under fire over St Andrew Square plans&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=13819#post-170412</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">170412@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;HERITAGE chiefs have blasted developers behind a new shopping centre after they ditched plans to rebuild a city landmark.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62; &#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/developers-under-fire-over-st-andrew-square-plans-1-3589979&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/developers-under-fire-over-st-andrew-square-plans-1-3589979&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Bit late?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
