<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: New cash?</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: New cash?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 21:00:01 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>DdF on "New cash?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14340#post-179977</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>DdF</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">179977@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@dougal  No, it's not quite that.  Cycling infra cash has never (to our knowledge) included bus shelters.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;There is one exception, which was basically an error by Govt Finance Cab secretary John Swinney MSP when he told Parliament that £10m was for cycling &#38;amp; walking infra when in fact it had already been announced months before that £5m of that was for 'Smarter Choices'.  He, or whoever wrote his speech, seemed to have forgotten that!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Anyway, that 'smarter choices' £5m active travel cash from the govt came with a clear stipulation that it could NOT be used for cycling or walking infra, but on close inspection of the detailed rules it can be used for bus shelters.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Furthermore, not only is that £5m not for infra, but it is also not just for cycling &#38;amp; walking - it is to encourage 'smarter choices' for any form of sustainable transport, e.g. to encourage people to go by bus or to car share.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We have no problem with the govt spending on encouraging modal shift to buses etc, building bus shelters etc, but NOT with money originally announced for walking &#38;amp; cycling, and then re-announced (inaccurately) for walking &#38;amp; cycling infra!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Full story &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.spokes.org.uk/2014/12/new-transport-minister-goes-skating/&#34;&#62;here&#60;/a&#62;.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>dougal on "New cash?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14340#post-179969</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dougal</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">179969@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think in the past Spokes have complained/noted that &#34;cycling and walking infra&#34; seems to include bus stops, which are neither of these things and tend to get in the way of both.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>fimm on "New cash?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14340#post-179917</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 10:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fimm</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">179917@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;The &#34;quote&#34; markup doesn't work very well.&#60;br /&#62;
I just tend to put quotes into italics (&#60;em&#62;I&#60;/em&#62;)&#60;br /&#62;
Thus:&#60;br /&#62;
[ i ]italics [ /i ]&#60;br /&#62;
(with spaces so you can see the markup)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>ih on "New cash?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14340#post-179869</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ih</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">179869@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;What's the markup formula you all use for qotes please. I clearly got it wrong in last post.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>ih on "New cash?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14340#post-179868</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ih</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">179868@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;[/quote to support cycling and walking infrastructure/ sounds dubious. Shared paths?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SRD on "New cash?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14340#post-179863</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SRD</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">179863@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;hearing murmurs from various sources that it ain't new money. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;will update when its clear
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Morningsider on "New cash?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14340#post-179850</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Morningsider</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">179850@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;SRD - the SG press release states &#34;£3.9m to support cycling and walking infrastructure&#34;.  I can't find anything more definitive than that at the moment.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SRD on "New cash?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14340#post-179846</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SRD</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">179846@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Spokes is reporting that John Swinney has just magicked up an extra £4m for cycling.  which at least means spending not decreasing. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;but is it 'infra' money? or soft measures?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
