http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Topic: more segregation for glasgow en Tue, 19 May 2026 00:20:08 +0000 http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14737#post-191442 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:20:35 +0000 Darkerside 191442@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>@Arellcat</p> <p>It's a "30mph" road, with the quotes implying speeds closer to 40 because of the width and visibility distance.</p> <p>From the GoBike article I think it's just to try out a number of different styles of soft segregation and seek feedback. I don't imagine there's been any assessment of cycle traffic load. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14737#post-191441 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:14:20 +0000 sallyhinch 191441@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Blogger's view <a href="http://glasgowcycleinfra.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/aitkenhead-road.html" rel="nofollow">http://glasgowcycleinfra.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/aitkenhead-road.html</a> </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14737#post-191431 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:18:48 +0000 Arellcat 191431@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>What is the design speed of this segregation, and what is the width? Is it aimed at pootlers on two wheels? </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14737#post-191428 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:57:31 +0000 neddie 191428@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>There are other segregation methods on trial in the same lane:</p> <p>E.g.</p> <p><img src="http://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/IMG_0249-e1434637631958-225x300.jpg"></p> <p><img src="http://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/IMG_0250-e1434637662559-225x300.jpg"> </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14737#post-191426 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:48:13 +0000 Edinburgh Cycle Training 191426@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Not Brilliant, but good? yeah. Considerably better than just paint </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14737#post-191424 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:27:55 +0000 Darkerside 191424@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>OK, it's far too narrow.</p> <p>However, it's better than the vertical-edged concrete dividers that we have elsewhere, which vehicles can just drive over and which reduce the width of the cyclelane considerably. With appropriate spacing, you could also merge right out of the cyclelane into traffic if you need to turn right (because there's no way junctions will be well thought out).</p> <p>Clicking through to the article there are some other options as well. I'll take the bike down the and have a gander... </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14737#post-191421 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:01:52 +0000 ih 191421@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>OMG! Does anyone think this is good? </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14737#post-191418 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:41:40 +0000 neddie 191418@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Cycle Lane Segregation: trial on Aikenhead Road by Glasgow City Council</p> <p><a href="http://www.gobike.org/cycle-lane-segregation-trial-on-aikenhead-road-by-glasgow-city-council-1005" rel="nofollow">http://www.gobike.org/cycle-lane-segregation-trial-on-aikenhead-road-by-glasgow-city-council-1005</a></p> <p><img src="http://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/IMG_0247-e1434637523859.jpg"> </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=14737#post-187145 Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:13:36 +0000 SRD 187145@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p><a href="http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/transport/funding-boost-for-walking-and-cycling-in-glasgow.124387223" rel="nofollow">http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/transport/funding-boost-for-walking-and-cycling-in-glasgow.124387223</a></p> <p>"WALKING and cycling in Glasgow is being given a £1.2 million boost which will see some of the city's busiest street redesigned." </p>