<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Six years ago Edinburgh signed up to a Cycling Treaty</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Six years ago Edinburgh signed up to a Cycling Treaty</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 11:14:59 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>gibbo on "Six years ago Edinburgh signed up to a Cycling Treaty"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15241#post-194883</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 11:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gibbo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">194883@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62; &#34;To set a target of at least 15% for the share of cycling in the modal split of trips for the year 2020 and of further growth if this target already is achieved&#34;&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;My theory is that they left out a decimal point, and that &#34;growth&#34; should be &#34;reduction&#34;.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;i.e. That the council's goal is to try to reduce the cycling menace to just 1.5% of journeys. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;That would certainly fit the council's actions over the last 6 years far better than the theory that they want to encourage cycling.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Six years ago Edinburgh signed up to a Cycling Treaty"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15241#post-194783</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">194783@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;All questions worth asking Lesley Hinds. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The 'official' CEC view is that the 15% only refers to &#60;em&#62;journeys to work&#60;/em&#62;. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I don't know if anyone cycled to Brussels to renegotiate the agreement...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wilmington&#039;s Cow on "Six years ago Edinburgh signed up to a Cycling Treaty"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15241#post-194779</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Wilmington&#039;s Cow</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">194779@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;chdot wrote about it in detail &#60;a href=&#34;https://cyclingedinburgh.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/edinburgh-council-signs-cycle-treaty/&#34;&#62;here&#60;/a&#62;. This was after all the rhetoric about becoming a model cycling city etc etc.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As mentioned in the link there was a commitment, that being, &#34;To set a target of at least 15% for the share of cycling in the modal split of trips for the year 2020 and of further growth if this target already is achieved&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;That gave 11 years to achieve the split, &#60;em&#62;at least&#60;/em&#62; 15%, and hey, further growth if the target is &#60;em&#62;already&#60;/em&#62; (i.e. before 2020) achieved. 6 years down the line, more than halfway to the 2020 aim, what's the modal share? SPOKES a couple of years ago estimated between 5% and 9% (after counts showed something like 7.3%).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Are we going to his 15%? Obviously the target became downgraded to an aspiration and so on. Is an increase of 5% modal share (taking the optimistic view we're now at 10%) possible inside the next 4 and a half years?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
