http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Topic: Latest EEN froth en Fri, 22 May 2026 03:21:21 +0000 http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15404#post-198150 Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:04:59 +0000 PS 198150@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p><em>The whole point about cyclists interacting with pedestrians would be minimised by making the south ramp the main access ramp with a rank of cycle racks where the taxi rank used to be. </em></p> <p>Even if you kept the racks where they currently are, south rank access would allow cyclists to get to the racks with the minimum of fuss and conflict. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15404#post-198146 Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:54:44 +0000 paulmilne 198146@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>The whole point about cyclists interacting with pedestrians would be minimised by making the <strong>south</strong> ramp the main access ramp with a rank of cycle racks where the taxi rank used to be. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15404#post-198066 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 17:09:00 +0000 nevelbell 198066@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>"CYLCERIST" - Love it! </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15404#post-198045 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 13:20:31 +0000 threefromleith 198045@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Very good 'rant'.</p> <p>Mind you, I thought the usual anti-everything EEN commenters were bad until I saw the comments on road.cc under Magnatom's 'karma' video last week... </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15404#post-198044 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 13:07:54 +0000 acsimpson 198044@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>@skotl, I assume that was a subtler version of your rant. If so it seems to have been lost on most other commenters. Either way it's pretty funny. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15404#post-197936 Sat, 05 Sep 2015 07:35:41 +0000 steveo 197936@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Seems to be loads of pro cycling folk on countering the usual nonsense. I'm shocked! </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15404#post-197935 Sat, 05 Sep 2015 01:26:42 +0000 skotl 197935@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p><a href="http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/transport/waverley-cycling-ban-ends-for-new-bike-lane-1-3877582" rel="nofollow">http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/transport/waverley-cycling-ban-ends-for-new-bike-lane-1-3877582</a></p> <p>My favourite response is "Why do cyclists need into the station. If they have a bike why do they want a train?"...</p> <p>My response is the hyperbole posted under "mellifluous bufo". </p>