<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;the false dichotomy of bikes-versus-vehicle flow&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;the false dichotomy of bikes-versus-vehicle flow&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 23:10:49 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>chdot on "&#34;the false dichotomy of bikes-versus-vehicle flow&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15518#post-200525</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">200525@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;There is also the false dichotomy of bikes-versus-vehicle flow. Getting many more people on bikes frees up both road space and seats on public transport, making everyone’s life easier.  Well, not strictly everyone. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;To make cities more attractive for cyclists they must necessarily be made less attractive for car drivers, with low speed limits on side roads and bike-permeable barriers to stop rat-running. This is a hurdle too far for most British politicians, which makes Johnson’s efforts in London, however flawed they are in part, also deserving of some credit.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2015/sep/30/leave-class-out-of-the-london-cycling-debate&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2015/sep/30/leave-class-out-of-the-london-cycling-debate&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
