<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;How St Andrew Square was meant to be&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;How St Andrew Square was meant to be&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 01:40:58 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>chdot on "&#34;How St Andrew Square was meant to be&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=15841#post-206509</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">206509@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This document refers to the permanent changes envisaged for the Gardens, not the temporary additions which Essential Edinburgh encourages with such gusto. However, as a statement of intent, as an outline of what councillors thought they were getting when they approved the scheme, it uncovers a quite astonishing gulf between aspiration and today's reality.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.broughtonspurtle.org.uk/news/how-st-andrew-square-was-meant-be&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.broughtonspurtle.org.uk/news/how-st-andrew-square-was-meant-be&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
