<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Future Cities vs Space for Living</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Future Cities vs Space for Living</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 21:39:18 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>AKen on "Future Cities vs Space for Living"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16067#post-212023</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>AKen</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">212023@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Predicting the future has a famously low success rate. Fifty years ago, who would have thought humans could carry around in their hands a device that could access the sum of all human knowledge - and then use it to share pictures of what they just had for their tea?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stephan Matthiesen on "Future Cities vs Space for Living"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16067#post-212007</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephan Matthiesen</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">212007@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;In the picture I can see 5 drones in a city that must house several million people. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;In my old 1950s book there were also pictures of wide motorways with one single floating car, inside a happy family in cardigans playing a board game. No, they didn't think everybody would be glued to a smartphone screen, that the motorway would be full of lorries and vans, and the teenage kids would be off to a hackathon or cosplay instead of driving to the country with the parents.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>wingpig on "Future Cities vs Space for Living"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16067#post-212006</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wingpig</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">212006@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;What's the point in 3D-printing food? Just pump sufficient quantities of each type of mushstock into the same tub and eat/drink it without wasting time arranging it fancily.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>cc on "Future Cities vs Space for Living"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16067#post-212004</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>cc</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">212004@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;And with &#60;a href=&#34;http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/transportation/mass-transit/maglev-elevators-will-take-you-up-down-and-sideways-by-2016&#34;&#62;maglev lifts&#60;/a&#62; there will be no need for walking, either
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stephan Matthiesen on "Future Cities vs Space for Living"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16067#post-212002</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephan Matthiesen</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">212002@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;SUPER skyscrapers, underwater cities and 3D-printed homes will be a reality in 100 years’ time, according to a report.&#60;br /&#62;
(...)&#60;br /&#62;
The academics say ‘bubble cities’ will be created underwater and personal drones will become a staple mode of transport. In the workplace, holograms will enable virtual meetings to take place.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As kid I had an old book from the 1950s where most of this was promised for the year 2000, thanks to cheap nuclear energy. Yes, underwater and underground cities, self-driving flying cars (the word &#34;drone&#34; hadn't been invented) and 3-d televised meetings (the word &#34;virtual meeting&#34; hadn't been invented).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;At age 7 I was totally convinced that I wouldn't need a driving license because present-day cars would be long gone when I'm 18.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LaidBack on "Future Cities vs Space for Living"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16067#post-212000</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LaidBack</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">212000@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.thenational.scot/business/earth-scrapers-meetings-by-hologram-and-3d-printed-food-will-be-commonplace-in-100-years-says-report.13718&#34;&#62;‘Earth-scrapers’, meetings by hologram and 3D-printed food will be commonplace in 100 years, says report&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;Edinburgh was lucky that Patrick Geddes looked at cities from a human perspective!&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;/em&#62;&#60;br /&#62;
Link above to piece about Samsung's 'SmartThings Future Living Report.&#60;br /&#62;
- A vision of city living which lacks any green, communal space.&#60;br /&#62;
- Who needs trees when you can view them in Samsung 3D?&#60;br /&#62;
People will be going on training courses to let them visually interpret 'the real world'. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Of course there will be no need for bicycles in these mega structures. Modal shift will mean changing from ground based cars to flying drones.&#60;br /&#62;
I wonder how many people find these visions depressing? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;To me it looks like repeating an SF version of a city from the 1950s.&#60;br /&#62;
Is this really the best they can do? Maybe I'm missing something.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Apple of course should be able to suggest an alternative, but I have my doubts.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
