<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: (UK) &#34;Govt&#039;s new cycling investment strategy lacks the investment bit&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: (UK) &#34;Govt&#039;s new cycling investment strategy lacks the investment bit&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:25:03 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>slowcoach on "(UK) &#34;Govt&#039;s new cycling investment strategy lacks the investment bit&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16212#post-215468</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>slowcoach</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">215468@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Some of the &#60;a href=&#34;https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/cycling#cycling-research-and-statistics&#34;&#62;research&#60;/a&#62; and &#60;a href=&#34;https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/cycling#case-studies-developing-new-cycling-infrastructure&#34;&#62;case studies &#60;/a&#62;might be useful.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>gibbo on "(UK) &#34;Govt&#039;s new cycling investment strategy lacks the investment bit&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16212#post-215350</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gibbo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">215350@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;&#34;This amounts to just £1.39 per head&#34;&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I guess the whole thing hinges on whether we can get the same results with £1.39 that the Netherlands gets with £24.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'll be honest, I'm not optimistic.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "(UK) &#34;Govt&#039;s new cycling investment strategy lacks the investment bit&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16212#post-215274</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2016 23:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">215274@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;The Department for Transport has released its long-awaited active-travel strategy. Known by transport wonks as Cee-Whizz, the Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy, or CWIS, has very little whizz about it. The strategy merely repeats the existing pledge to spend £300m over five years. This amounts to just £1.39 per head, far short of the £10 per head demanded by the parliamentary Get Britain Cycling report of 2013.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.bikebiz.com/news/read/govt-s-new-cycling-investment-strategy-lacks-the-investment-bit/019323&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.bikebiz.com/news/read/govt-s-new-cycling-investment-strategy-lacks-the-investment-bit/019323&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
