<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Parking in the city</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Parking in the city</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:03:50 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>chdot on "Parking in the city"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=1635#post-15839</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15839@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;NCP bosses identified Castle Street&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Yeah I saw that and thought they were revising the plan to put cars &#60;em&#62;under&#60;/em&#62; George Street.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;(I believe it's solid rock.)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Edinburgh is still stuck in the 'prosperity = shops = people who drive to them'&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This is an old model - people drive 'out of town' (Gyle etc.), Tourists tend not arrive by car, some people walk, cycle bus...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;Even if&#60;/em&#62; it was true, plenty of reasons for changing it!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>wingpig on "Parking in the city"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=1635#post-15837</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wingpig</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15837@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I assume the use of 'Street' in&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;code&#62;&#34;As part of this strategy, NCP bosses identified Castle &#60;strong&#62;Street&#60;/strong&#62; car park as an opportunity for development, but its lease with the council did not include the right to build on it.&#34;&#60;/code&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;is a typing slip or moment of inattention, not a cause for alarm in the hint of other, secret plans?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Parking in the city"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=1635#post-15831</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15831@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;A very strange tale in today's News about the Council, one of its 'arms length' companies and NCP which sheds a bit of light on the chance of less parking (and therefore less traffic) in the city centre.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;Lawyers for EDI told the court that their clients were told by council chiefs that the Castle Terrace project could only proceed if alternative car parking space was provided.'&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/topstories/City-developer-wins-5m-court.6609132.jp&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/topstories/City-developer-wins-5m-court.6609132.jp&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
