<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Campaigners say Richmond bike lane should be removed after abuse from locals&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Campaigners say Richmond bike lane should be removed after abuse from locals&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>gembo on "&#34;Campaigners say Richmond bike lane should be removed after abuse from locals&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16952#post-232252</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gembo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">232252@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;also driver uses phone to film the cylcists who are not breaking the law whereas he is breaking the law.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;My friend lives in Richmond and cycles through the park to Roehampton.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I know the bus route just now from Richmond to Ham is very very disrupted by ingoing road inprovement work.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We cycled from his house through the park and came out at Kingston which has functional cycle lanes then on down to East Molsey/Hampton Court to watch cycling at Olympics 2012. No one abused us.  Roads were shut all the way back so we cycled on them.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>jonty on "&#34;Campaigners say Richmond bike lane should be removed after abuse from locals&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16952#post-232232</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jonty</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">232232@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Some comments being made that it provides a route to park for kids etc but clearly isn't suitable a through route. What comes to mind is a painted lane on the road like on Buccleuth Street to make that clear - but (probably evidence-based) scepticism about that in the comments too.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Alternative answer: that video shows that &#34;drivers&#34; haven't behaved sufficiently well to be allowed onto that road and, as that comment says, they should use the A road provided for them and have through-access removed. If users complain, tell them that if mean vehicle speeds on adjacent side streets and the A-roads remain within a reasonable limit (ha!) then replacing access could be considered.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>fimm on "&#34;Campaigners say Richmond bike lane should be removed after abuse from locals&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16952#post-232230</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fimm</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">232230@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think that what the campaigners are saying is that the lane is worse than useless:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;- it is rubbish so no (or very few) cyclists use it&#60;br /&#62;
- it doesn't really make the cyclists who do use it any safer&#60;br /&#62;
- it causes those cyclists who don't use it to be abused by drivers who think they should be using it
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>neddie on "&#34;Campaigners say Richmond bike lane should be removed after abuse from locals&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16952#post-232225</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>neddie</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">232225@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;The answer has been made clear to them:&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Or prevent through-traffic. It is a park after all. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;From the comments:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;Most of the traffic on Priory Ln is actually coming from Clarence Ln, to avoid Roehampton Ln.  Great big queue every day, squeezing through the width barriers at the bottom.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As Andrew Cudd is of Wimbledon, that's exactly what he would have been doing, drive around the A3 and then rat run along Priory Ln rather than use the A306/Roehampton Ln, the main A road [altogether now] &#34;that has been provided for him&#34;.&#60;/em&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>dougal on "&#34;Campaigners say Richmond bike lane should be removed after abuse from locals&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16952#post-232222</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dougal</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">232222@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;looking at ways to improve safety on Priory Lane ... &#34;This would include widening the carriageway and installing additional safety features to reduce vehicle speeds.&#34;&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Seems a bit of a mish-mash. Widening the carriageway will encourage &#60;em&#62;increased&#60;/em&#62; vehicle speeds.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The answer has been made clear to them: make a continuous cycle path, not a dozen short paths separate by side roads where cyclists do not have priority.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "&#34;Campaigners say Richmond bike lane should be removed after abuse from locals&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16952#post-232218</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">232218@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Reading the article, are they (the campaigners) not saying the lane should be improved and action should be taken against abusive drivers?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "&#34;Campaigners say Richmond bike lane should be removed after abuse from locals&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=16952#post-232161</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">232161@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://road.cc/content/news/205733-campaigners-say-richmond-bike-lane-should-be-removed-after-abuse-locals-and&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://road.cc/content/news/205733-campaigners-say-richmond-bike-lane-should-be-removed-after-abuse-locals-and&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
