<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Views on Vermarc sizing...</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Views on Vermarc sizing...</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 02:39:13 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Mandopicker101 on "Views on Vermarc sizing..."</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=17984#post-256529</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 15:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mandopicker101</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">256529@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Anyone familiar with Vermarc garments? How accurate is their sizing?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm looking at potential candidates to replace my fast disintegrating cycling jacket. I've found an excellent deal on a lightly used Vermarc jacket which is 'large', warm, fits well, has water resistance and doesn't scream with logos. All to the good. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;However, Vermarc's website claims Large equates to about 39-inches across the chest. I'm someplace around 40 at the moment. Close-fitting is OK. Race fit also acceptable. The 'Body paint' look is much less so.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
