<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Disappearing pavements</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Disappearing pavements</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 16:28:17 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>David Hunter on "Disappearing pavements"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18064#post-258470</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2017 22:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>David Hunter</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">258470@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;The Council's (very good) Street Design Guidance stipulates a minimum 'clear walking zone', free of any obstruction, of 1.5 metres. This is *supposed* to be mandatory. Anything less than 1m (which is required for a wheelchair user to pass) is in all likelihood in breach of the Equality Act...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/info/20089/roads_and_pavements/906/edinburgh_street_design&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/info/20089/roads_and_pavements/906/edinburgh_street_design&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tulyar on "Disappearing pavements"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18064#post-258415</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2017 09:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tulyar</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">258415@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;There might be a test of having a  minimum of 2 metres (sufficient space to pass 1 wheelchairs or peds with crutches), and a use of section  129.2 of Roads Scotland Act?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SRD on "Disappearing pavements"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18064#post-258400</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 21:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SRD</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">258400@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;It seems to be 'Living Streets' EDinburgh's main job. When they're not criticising cycle infra.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>dessert rat on "Disappearing pavements"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18064#post-258399</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 20:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dessert rat</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">258399@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Was up and down Hanover St a few times today and it got me wondering about who is meant to enforce/resist the ever encroaching commercialisation of our pavements.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;On the left-hand side - heading uphill, i reckon the pavement must be 3 to 4m wide. However in front several restaurants there's about 2 to 2.5m lost to outdoor seating, leaving 1.5 to 2m, which should be sufficient. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;However another 1m is lost at several points with the proliferation advert boards, pointing to pubs/restaurants they sit outside of, or up Thistle St etc..&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As a result there are a several places where the usable space is less than 1m. So people end up queuing to get through. Seems mental. I moved one of the signs today, but it was back taking primary position on the pavement within 30 mins.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Anyone know who in CEC is meant to enforce this ?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
