CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Topic: This is potentially very good for cycling http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Topic: This is potentially very good for cycling en Tue, 19 May 2026 17:07:15 +0000 Murun Buchstansangur on "This is potentially very good for cycling" http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18150#post-260934 Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:55:35 +0000 Murun Buchstansangur 260934@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Personally I don't think the very large estates (Atholl, Invercauld, etc) are particularly bike-unfriendly, probably better than average actually. Certainly with hill-walking the biggest access problems are with the relatively tiny ones eg North Chesthill.</p> <p>I think the market for 'touristic' estates outside of existing tourist areas like Aviemore/Spey Valley is likely to be pretty limited. </p> I were right about that saddle on "This is potentially very good for cycling" http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18150#post-260923 Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:33:20 +0000 I were right about that saddle 260923@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/17/lairds-could-forced-sell-land-snp-acreage-cap/" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/17/lairds-could-forced-sell-land-snp-acreage-cap/</a></p> <p>Smaller estates need more customers. We can maybe look forward to more Rothiemurcus style cycle-friendly countryside. </p>