http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Topic: Reimagining Melville Crescent en Thu, 21 May 2026 15:47:51 +0000 http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-265460 Thu, 02 Nov 2017 22:06:01 +0000 chdot 265460@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p><a href="http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/ccwel" rel="nofollow">http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/ccwel</a> </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-265435 Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:37:55 +0000 Stickman 265435@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>In the latest CCEWL update they say they've gone with Option A. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-263575 Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:05:59 +0000 cb 263575@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Main issue I can see with B is that cyclists could be obscured from the line of sight of right turning traffic by the statue. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-263508 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:48:05 +0000 gembo 263508@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>I went for B too </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-263507 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:47:16 +0000 stiltskin 263507@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>B also, for the same reasons as above </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-263500 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 10:45:22 +0000 Morningsider 263500@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Saw this on another thread a few days ago. I also went for option B as it keeps a direct cycle lane and tightens corner radii - slowing turning vehicles. It would also create some usable public space, no-one is going to sit in the middle of the traffic islands proposed in option A.</p> <p>I assume option C was only thrown in to make up the numbers - who would want to see a roundabout created here? </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-263498 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 10:29:47 +0000 Klaxon 263498@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Replied in support of option B, with remark to move the cycle lanes further back from the junction more in line with option C. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-263494 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 09:54:13 +0000 HankChief 263494@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Wondered why it wasn't get much interest... </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-263493 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 09:53:16 +0000 chdot 263493@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Just found this in spam. </p> http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18216#post-263074 Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:39:43 +0000 HankChief 263074@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>As part if CCWEL there are plans a foot to redesign Melville Crescent.</p> <p>What do we think?</p> <p><a href="http://www.theedinburghreporter.co.uk/2017/10/melville-street-reimagining/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theedinburghreporter.co.uk/2017/10/melville-street-reimagining/</a></p> <p><a href="https://consultationhub.edinburgh.gov.uk/sfc/reimagining-melville-crescent/" rel="nofollow">https://consultationhub.edinburgh.gov.uk/sfc/reimagining-melville-crescent/</a> </p>