CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Topic: “Four in five people back harsher penalties for aggressive drivers” http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Topic: “Four in five people back harsher penalties for aggressive drivers” en Sun, 31 May 2026 16:23:05 +0000 gembo on "“Four in five people back harsher penalties for aggressive drivers”" http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18250#post-263863 Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:42:15 +0000 gembo 263863@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Oops, PF sorry, gonna FOI the PF </p> I were right about that saddle on "“Four in five people back harsher penalties for aggressive drivers”" http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18250#post-263856 Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:14:43 +0000 I were right about that saddle 263856@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>The Crown Prosecution Service declined to be involved due to the events in question taking place in the Rìoghachd na h-Alba. The Procurator Fiscal may be gently quizzed at some point and may or may not chose to share with Her Majesty's dutiful subjects. Word up on the street, yo? </p> gembo on "“Four in five people back harsher penalties for aggressive drivers”" http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18250#post-263855 Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:53:34 +0000 gembo 263855@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>@iwrats, any Intel on why crown prosecution went for the guilty on the breaking in to the premises but not on the fire starting? </p> I were right about that saddle on "“Four in five people back harsher penalties for aggressive drivers”" http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18250#post-263852 Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:33:03 +0000 I were right about that saddle 263852@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p><a href="http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=17084#post-263625">Just a quick reminder that you can burn a cycling charity to the ground on CCTV without being punished for it.</a></p> <p>Unlikely that hard-pressed motorists making determined progress to move the economy forward will face any meaningful consequence - and nor should they. </p> gembo on "“Four in five people back harsher penalties for aggressive drivers”" http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18250#post-263850 Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:24:40 +0000 gembo 263850@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p>Surely they mean Harsher penalties for other aggressive drivers not them, they are not aggressive, merely assertively getting in front? </p> chdot on "“Four in five people back harsher penalties for aggressive drivers”" http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18250#post-263848 Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:17:06 +0000 chdot 263848@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/ <p><a href="http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/four-in-five-people-back-harsher-penalties-for-aggressive-drivers-according-to-survey-355648" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/four-in-five-people-back-harsher-penalties-for-aggressive-drivers-according-to-survey-355648</a> </p>