<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Development is given go-ahead despite likeness to buildings that were banned&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Development is given go-ahead despite likeness to buildings that were banned&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 06:30:07 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>druidh on "&#34;Development is given go-ahead despite likeness to buildings that were banned&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=1854#post-18998</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>druidh</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18998@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Like the original plans but half the height then?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "&#34;Development is given go-ahead despite likeness to buildings that were banned&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=1854#post-18955</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18955@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Also from the EEN;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;&#60;strong&#62;Eight firms vie for chance to 70s develop office block&#60;/strong&#62;&#60;br /&#62;
Eight hotel operators have lodged bids to redevelop a &#34;brutal&#34; 1970s office block into a 157-bed hotel.&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Should I point out to them that it's &#34;brutalist&#34; not &#34;brutal&#34; and it's derived from the French for &#34;raw concrete&#34; and not our modern English use of the word? Or shall we leave them be in their ignorance?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "&#34;Development is given go-ahead despite likeness to buildings that were banned&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=1854#post-18842</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18842@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Wonder what they had against the old &#34;monument&#34; that has been missing for a number of years now
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "&#34;Development is given go-ahead despite likeness to buildings that were banned&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=1854#post-18840</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18840@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;br /&#62;
CONTROVERSIAL plans for a major new development on one of the main gateways into Edinburgh have been given the green light after a developer behind plans for a 17-storey hotel on the site was forced to scale back its plans. Councillors voted unanimously in favour of an eight-storey scheme next to Haymarket railway station, which its architect claims will see the creation of a new &#34;monument&#34; in the capital's West End.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;But campaigners said they were hopeful that plans  for the site would be called in for a third time because of the impact they would have on the area, particularly the nearby Dalry Colonies.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland/Development-is-given-goahead-despite.6654659.jp&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland/Development-is-given-goahead-despite.6654659.jp&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
