<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: “&#34;The anti-cycling lobby would say &#039;there&#039;s not a demand for this, “</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: “&#34;The anti-cycling lobby would say &#039;there&#039;s not a demand for this, “</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 14:43:47 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>chdot on "“&#34;The anti-cycling lobby would say &#039;there&#039;s not a demand for this, “"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=18731#post-279973</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">279973@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;“&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;The anti-cycling lobby would say 'there's not a demand for this, people are not using it, people don't want to cycle', but actually I think these show that when infrastructure is there people are using it.&#34;  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Researchers also warned that cycleways recently axed or aborted amid local opposition – such as the Bearsway route in East Dunbartonshire or the Holmston Road route in Ayr – highlighted the need for “timely dialogue” with communities and stronger leadership.   &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;“&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15151916.Cycleways_in_Glasgow__risk_exacerbating_health_inequalities__between_rich_and_poor/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15151916.Cycleways_in_Glasgow__risk_exacerbating_health_inequalities__between_rich_and_poor/&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
