<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: “New and upgraded roads should prioritise pedestrians, cyclists and PT” NICE</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: “New and upgraded roads should prioritise pedestrians, cyclists and PT” NICE</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:23:59 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>neddie on "“New and upgraded roads should prioritise pedestrians, cyclists and PT” NICE"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=19369#post-298684</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>neddie</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">298684@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;If all the reports I have seen in my 35 year career in transport on how car use should be replaced by cycling/walking were piled up strategically we would have loads of filtered permeability. Plus they could be soaked in cement and made into the kerbs protecting cycle lanes.&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://twitter.com/CHAIRRDRF/status/1081206633475330048&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://twitter.com/CHAIRRDRF/status/1081206633475330048&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;If Britain had a kilometre of protected cycleway for every page printed by government over the decades on how cycling should be prioritised, we might be getting somewhere&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://twitter.com/ETAservicesltd/status/1081198100079874048&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://twitter.com/ETAservicesltd/status/1081198100079874048&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>neddie on "“New and upgraded roads should prioritise pedestrians, cyclists and PT” NICE"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=19369#post-298656</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 10:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>neddie</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">298656@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;This is just deflection tactics to maintain the status quo.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We'll spend megabucks to build &#38;amp; widen roads and then and only then might we chuck in a few bike lanes...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;How's about we stop building and widening roads altogether (as it solves nothing) and spend all of the same money on adding bike lanes &#38;amp; prioritising pedestrians &#60;em&#62;on existing routes&#60;/em&#62;?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Eh? Eh?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We'll know that they're taking climate breakdown seriously when they start spending more than half the transport budget on active travel.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>gembo on "“New and upgraded roads should prioritise pedestrians, cyclists and PT” NICE"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=19369#post-298650</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 09:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gembo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">298650@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Ok, I see The National Institute for Clinical Excellence, normally the guidance issued for NHS medicine research is wading in through the looming type 2 diabetes angle.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;NICE one
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "“New and upgraded roads should prioritise pedestrians, cyclists and PT” NICE"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=19369#post-298649</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 09:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">298649@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;“&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;New and upgraded roads should prioritise pedestrians, cyclists and public transport over motorised vehicles &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;“&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://www.nice.org.uk/news/article/new-and-upgraded-roads-should-prioritise-pedestrians-cyclists-and-public-transport-over-motorised-vehicles&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://www.nice.org.uk/news/article/new-and-upgraded-roads-should-prioritise-pedestrians-cyclists-and-public-transport-over-motorised-vehicles&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
