<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: “Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: “Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 21:50:15 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Ed1 on "“Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20134#post-324406</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ed1</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324406@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;£294,000  does not sound like that much
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tulyar on "“Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20134#post-324403</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tulyar</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324403@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think a &#34;DestinationBikePark&#34; study is needed, rather like the work I did with Hackney &#38;amp; Cambridge (&#38;amp; slightly linked to the 1995 work with Glasgow - which delivered a monitored increase of 30+% year on year growth in parked bike counts* for the installation of standard on street cycle parking - at the rate of 200-400 units per year.(* a 'local' increase in cycle use of 30+% albeit diluted in the wider area of the city)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Best performing project of public cycle parking is Glasgow Conservatoire (RSAMD in old money) from 1 bike locked on a bollard in 1995 there is now a shelter with 48 spaces, often  filled to capacity&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;One serious caveat, which I've discussed in part with @arellcat re parking at her workplace. This must be purchased against a specification NOT solely selected on price. We set this up in 1995 for the basic U hoops that Glasgow orders.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;1) the tube material, wall thickness, bending (proper mandrel bends with recognised (4xD) minimum radius &#38;amp; no 'flattening'), made from single length of tube (no stitched together off-cuts - 1 x 6.3m standard length makes 2 hoops to Sheffield City Engineers spec - no welded bends) NB of you make the hoops 'short' &#38;amp; claim that 70 cm is enough to support a bike you can 'squeeze' 3 hoops from a standard length of 48.3mm tube or BS 1.5&#34; 'Heavy' gauge gas pipe.&#60;br /&#62;
2) tube finishes - specified minimum thickness if hot dip galvanised inside &#38;amp; outside &#38;amp; or coatings (best is fully coloured polyeurathane -'Ferrocast' as used on oil rigs - up to 10mm thick - can have embedded reflectives - 'soft' finish does not scratch bikes - self colour never needs painting) or stainless steel (NOT polished, &#38;amp; MUST have means to make it visible to VI pedesrians as it reflects the colours of its surroundings).&#60;br /&#62;
3) tapping rail/panel a) to be detectable with a cane/ stop guide dog going underneath b) to stop locked bike/bike lock sliding down vertical c) to make stands 'visible' with parking sign, or sponsor advertising&#60;br /&#62;
4) defined options for fixing down (&#38;amp; contractor specs) &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Not also that 2-tier units are&#60;br /&#62;
- much more expensive per bike,&#60;br /&#62;
- need ceiling soffit of 2.6-2.8 metres (min)&#60;br /&#62;
- need substantial foundations - cantilever loads - heavy frames - windage forces&#60;br /&#62;
- loads of wearing parts to maintain (cheap ones sieze up)&#60;br /&#62;
- can be noisy in use (Chelmsford Station bans use of upper trays 23.00-07.00)&#60;br /&#62;
- cheap units cut corners - poor quality bearings - no latching detents (upper trays have fallen on heads of those using lower trays) - barely galvanised - inadequate structural competence (tack welds where proper full-run penetration required) - units bend under load - joints badly assembled (bolts carry all stresses rather than faces clamped together) &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Most notorious product - Allpark - installed and removed from Sevenoaks, but also Milton Keynes, Horsham, &#38;amp; Glasgow Caledonian University.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I can advise - based on designing &#38;amp; specifying this for around 30 years
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "“Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20134#post-324383</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324383@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;“Who reckons that is what this is?”&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Is that a trick question?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Possible answers -&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;1) the minister&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;2) nobody
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Morningsider on "“Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20134#post-324381</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Morningsider</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324381@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;£294,000 would have bought you 340cm of M74 extension.  It is roughly 0.01% of the cost of dualling the A9.  Why announce this?  Why make such an outrageous claim for the effect it will have?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm all for improving cycling facilities at schools, colleges and universities.  It is a good thing - especially where it is part of a coherent, long-term investment plan to develop a comprehensive network of high quality segregated cycle routes, safer streets, filtered permeability and associated traffic demand reduction.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Who reckons that is what this is?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>I were right about that saddle on "“Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20134#post-324373</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>I were right about that saddle</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324373@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;To be fair any cycle journey benefits many people through reduced emissions, healthcare and congestion.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;To be unfair that is total male cow poop.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "“Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20134#post-324372</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324372@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I’m sure you could get more than one advice leaflet for £1.13.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Morningsider on "“Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20134#post-324370</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Morningsider</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324370@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Incredible quote from the press release:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;More than 261,000 people will benefit from the funding which will provide new or improved cycling facilities.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So, £294,000 will benefit 261,000 people - or £1.13 per person!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If you assume all of this will be spent on new Sheffield stands, and that an installed stand costs £150, then you would have to lock 133 bikes to each stand for 261,000 people to benefit.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "“Over £294,000 for cycling facilities across Scottish schools and campuses“"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20134#post-324326</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324326@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://www.transport.gov.scot/news/over-294-000-for-cycling-facilities-across-scottish-schools-and-campuses/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://www.transport.gov.scot/news/over-294-000-for-cycling-facilities-across-scottish-schools-and-campuses/&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
