<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Petition to review future for M8 in Centre of Glasgow</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Petition to review future for M8 in Centre of Glasgow</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>chdot on "Petition to review future for M8 in Centre of Glasgow"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20745#post-367576</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 21:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">367576@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;“&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Back in early 1972, mere days before the opening of the Charing Cross section of Glasgow’s controversial inner ring-road, Hanley, an esteemed journalist, novelist and lyricist, wrote a long and thoughtful article for the Glasgow Herald. The city’s ring-road plan, he began, was bold, imaginative and startling and, if it all went through, “the result will be a monument to [Glasgow] Corporation’s ability to think big.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;“Unfortunately,” he added, “it isn’t much fun living in a monument. More and more people are coming to the view that they would rather live in a city, while simultaneously the current planning philosophy is trying to make less and less city available for them”. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;“&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/23453466.m8-glasgow-scrapped/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/23453466.m8-glasgow-scrapped/&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yodhrin on "Petition to review future for M8 in Centre of Glasgow"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20745#post-355181</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Yodhrin</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">355181@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think the first option would be better. Ideally you'd want the area bounded by Lothian Road, Melville Drive, the Bridges, and Queen Street to be completely car-free except for the minimum necessary loading permits and residential access for the elderly and disabled, and then turn the neighbourhoods around that area into LTNs, so there shouldn't be a need for any kind of &#34;feeder&#34; roads into or out of the city centre.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Whether the council have the stones to go that far is another matter.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "Petition to review future for M8 in Centre of Glasgow"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20745#post-355179</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">355179@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;actually use it properly&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As in, restoring railway tracks with a station on Lothian Road? Not a bad idea...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>jonty on "Petition to review future for M8 in Centre of Glasgow"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20745#post-355175</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jonty</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">355175@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;My feeling with the Western Approach is either create a high line-style wilderness corridor through the city (with proper paved cycle &#38;amp; pedestrian path integrated) or actually use it properly ie. filter Fountainbridge, get rid of the Shandon slip road &#38;amp; put a roundabout there to allow the Roseburn rat runs to be bypassed and filtered too etc etc
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>gembo on "Petition to review future for M8 in Centre of Glasgow"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20745#post-355165</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gembo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">355165@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I suppose the answer is where will all the rush hour vehicles go?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The western approach is merely a pimped up road.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The m8 through Glasgow is a six lane highway that destroyed communities when it was built. The more apt comparison is with  the Edinburgh bypass
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MediumDave on "Petition to review future for M8 in Centre of Glasgow"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20745#post-355162</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MediumDave</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">355162@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Oh that would be so wonderful.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tulyar on "Petition to review future for M8 in Centre of Glasgow"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20745#post-355158</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tulyar</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">355158@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;People are asking questions - if its this broke, &#38;amp; under-used outside peak hours, why are we bothering to keep it&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://petitions.parliament.scot/petitions/PE1906&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://petitions.parliament.scot/petitions/PE1906&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Next on the list West Approach Road?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
