<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: “  ‘Computer says road’: call for change to ‘crude’ planning models”</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: “  ‘Computer says road’: call for change to ‘crude’ planning models”</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 08:48:20 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>CocoShepherd on "“  ‘Computer says road’: call for change to ‘crude’ planning models”"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20860#post-358704</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>CocoShepherd</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">358704@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;blockquote&#62;The Department for Transport strongly denied any bias towards road-building in its modelling, and a spokesperson said: “The environment is at the heart of our proposed transport schemes, and we always encourage sustainable options such as public transport, cycling and walking&#60;/blockquote&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Hilarious/derisory
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "“  ‘Computer says road’: call for change to ‘crude’ planning models”"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20860#post-358698</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">358698@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;“&#60;br /&#62;
Traffic modelling spreadsheets that “almost always tell us that ‘computer says road’” should no longer be used by planners and more money should be spent on building places geared for walking, cycling and public transport, according to a report by the Create Streets campaign.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;…&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The attack on “big road urbanism” argues that the Department for Transport cost-benefit modelling tools for new roads fail to “properly capture non-travel-time benefits, such as health, wellbeing and the environment … so the answer will always be to build more or bigger roads”.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The Department for Transport strongly denied any bias towards road-building in its modelling, and a spokesperson said: “The environment is at the heart of our proposed transport schemes, and we always encourage sustainable options such as public transport, cycling and walking.”&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;“ &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/feb/23/computer-says-road-call-for-change-to-crude-planning-models&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/feb/23/computer-says-road-call-for-change-to-crude-planning-models&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
