<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Legal (TRO) question</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Legal (TRO) question</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 11:48:30 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Morningsider on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360816</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 19:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Morningsider</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360816@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Are pavement build outs always accompanied by an RSO? I can't find any record of an RSO for the substantial pavement build outs created during the resurfacing of Lothian Road.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>boothym on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360810</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 17:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>boothym</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360810@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;An ETRO wouldn't cover it in the meantime - two bollards either side to block parking?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360809</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 17:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360809@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@Frenchy &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;But &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;“They've added the Wardie Road example to their list of minor improvements”&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Main question is why aren’t such things (access to NEPN) already on a list - in fact sorted years ago…?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Additionally I’m reasonably sure a local resident has already contacted CEC about this (will check).
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Frenchy on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360808</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 17:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Frenchy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360808@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;IF CEC put in place a ‘pavement extension’, at least as wide as the gap in the wall and the width of a car onto the road - plus (presumably) bollards, would that be the same as the process for DYLs or??&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;CEC have clarified to me that it would require an RSO, rather than a TRO, but otherwise yes, same faff and timescale (12-18 months).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;They've added the Wardie Road example to their list of minor improvements, so I suppose we'll find out the timescale of adding a white line when it appears.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Frenchy on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360146</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Frenchy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360146@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@slowcoach - dropped kerbs were included in the &#34;pavement parking ban&#34; legislation. Due to come into force in...2024 (maybe).
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360145</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 21:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360145@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;“Though of course a pavement buildout would also help with visibility around the parked cars.“&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;YES&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Which is why I think they would be a good ‘statement’ - ‘advertising’ the NEPN, because it’s worth it…
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>boothym on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360144</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 21:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>boothym</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360144@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;On Street View there's some white lines further along the road at driveways, which seem to be respected. Though of course a pavement buildout would also help with visibility around the parked cars.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>slowcoach on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360142</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>slowcoach</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360142@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;AFAIK If it was in England, and the Council had got a Special Enforcement Area, they could issue penalty charges for parking at a dropped kerb without needing a TRO or even an access protection marking.  The Scottish Government hasn’t brought in similar legislation yet.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360140</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 19:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360140@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Not so easy in Fife -&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;“&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Please note we no longer provide white H bar markings at private residential driveways as due to over-use these markings were no longer effective. In certain circumstances we may provide them at accesses that are not obvious and would benefit from being highlighted. Please email &#60;a href=&#34;mailto:traffic.management@fife.gov.uk&#34;&#62;traffic.management@fife.gov.uk&#60;/a&#62; if you wish such an access to be assessed. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;“&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://www.fife.gov.uk/kb/docs/articles/roads,-travel-and-parking/roads-and-pavements/driveway-obstruction&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://www.fife.gov.uk/kb/docs/articles/roads,-travel-and-parking/roads-and-pavements/driveway-obstruction&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360139</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 19:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360139@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Seems you can BUY them if access is to your property!!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;https://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/roads-pavements/access-protection-markings/1&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/roads-pavements/access-protection-markings/1&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;There’s even a specific email -&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34; mailto:accessprotectionmarkings@edinburgh.gov.uk&#34;&#62;accessprotectionmarkings@edinburgh.gov.uk&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Might be worth suggesting a few places…
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Frenchy on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360137</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Frenchy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360137@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I suspect one answer to the extended pavement is &#34;A white line is a fraction of the cost, let's try that first.&#34;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360136</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360136@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;THANKS!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Frenchy on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360135</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Frenchy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360135@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;My understanding is: Yes, full TRO needed for DYLs. No TRO needed for white line; I've seen these be installed within a could of weeks.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Pavement extension is an excellent question, which I don't know the answer to. Will try and find out.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Legal (TRO) question"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=20929#post-360133</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">360133@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52038896257_361e22849a.jpg&#34;&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This is an entrance to the NEPN on Wardie Road. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Presume to get a DYL needs the full nonsense TRO process?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;A white line with end bars wouldn’t?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;That might be as effective in reality (vehicles frequently park here). &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;IF CEC put in place a ‘pavement extension’, at least as wide as the gap in the wall and the width of a car onto the road - plus (presumably) bollards, would that be the same as the process for DYLs or??
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
