<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: National speed management review</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: National speed management review</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 23:14:16 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>mcairney on "National speed management review"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=21663#post-377493</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 14:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mcairney</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">377493@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;There's 2 factors in play here:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;1. Aligning the speed limits between cars and HGVs should reduce the amount of risky overtakes/MGIFs.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;2. The proposed solution of increasing the speed limit of the largest, heaviest, least manouevrable vehicle is objectively crazy. Even taking the increase in kinetic energy in the event of a collision won't it also increase emissions and fuel consumption??&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Also RE: point 1 the sooner we have mandatory GPS-based speed limiters on vehicles the better, if only to eliminate all the 'passive' speeding +tailgating being done by all those 'above average' drivers out there.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>neddie on "National speed management review"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=21663#post-377487</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>neddie</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">377487@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Anyone who proposes and succeeds in raising a speed limit, be it HGVs or otherwise, will have blood on their hands
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>gembo on "National speed management review"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=21663#post-377486</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 08:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gembo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">377486@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;There was HGV madness in the Cowgate the other night. One going one way and another going the other - the latter turned up the taxi street to the royal Mile, feck knows how it then got out.  The other which was Dutch  passed me with inches of tolerance.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;@morningsider has predicted the outcome. Read it and weep.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Morningsider on "National speed management review"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=21663#post-377484</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 22:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Morningsider</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">377484@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Transport Scotland has launched a consultation on its &#60;a href=&#34;https://www.transport.gov.scot/consultation/national-speed-management-review-consultation/&#34;&#62;National speed management review&#60;/a&#62;. This floats two possible changes to speed limits on single carriageway roads subject to the 60mph national limit.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;1. Reduce the speed limit for general traffic from 60mph to 50mph.&#60;br /&#62;
2. Increase the HGV speed limit from 40mph to 50mph.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It also proposes changing the dual carriageway HGV speed limit from 50mph to 60mph.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If I was a betting type, I would say there was reasonable odds on the eventual outcome being HGV speed limits increasing while those for general traffic stay the same. I don't see the current SNP administration ignoring siren calls from the usual suspects about &#34;the impact on the economy&#34; from lowering the limit, especially in the run up to the 2026 election.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Hopefully I'm wrong.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
