<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Maps &#38; qualitative assessment</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Maps &#38; qualitative assessment</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 12:07:01 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>chrisfl on "Maps &#38; qualitative assessment"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2358#post-25112</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chrisfl</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25112@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;As far as I know they base the hostile-ness of a road on it's category So a B road is less hostile than an A road and unclassified and residential streets are thought to be quiet. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;However in cities I think this breaks down quite quickly. So unclassified roads tend to get rated as quiet, which in the city often isn't the case. The  cyclestreets guys have been promising a blog post on how they use OSM tagging to determine routes for some time...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;wingpig:  Even if you don't have time to edit, then stick a quick bug in using: &#60;a href=&#34;http://openstreetbugs.schokokeks.org/?zoom=13&#38;amp;lat=55.94339&#38;amp;lon=-3.20005&#38;amp;layers=B00T&#34;&#62;OpenStreetBugs&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>wingpig on "Maps &#38; qualitative assessment"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2358#post-25108</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wingpig</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25108@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I've been meaning to get round to signing up and logging-in to do some updating of stuff to OSM/CS since finding a couple of bits that the app repeatedly tries to route me down which are blocked by a shut door or a large fence. Wonder if I'll ever get round to doing it, much the same as I never get round to telling Spokes about some of the cobble-labelling omissions on their map?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dave on "Maps &#38; qualitative assessment"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2358#post-25106</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25106@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;All true. The problem with open source is that my complaint is really &#34;why haven't I fixed this&#34; ;-)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I suppose the problem illustrated in the above post is that quietness / hostility / routing are also heavily dependant on the individual. So only one person is ever going to be happy with Cyclestreets rulings (I suppose you could log in and set a bunch of parameters like &#34;I don't mind passing buses that have stopped: 1-5&#34;)?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>wingpig on "Maps &#38; qualitative assessment"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2358#post-25092</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wingpig</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25092@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think I just passed a mention somewhere on CycleStreets or OSM about time-of-day being rather impactful and thus destined for consideration at some point. Hopefully the threateningness as well as the busyness will be time-variable.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The hostility of a road very much depends on what you're trying to do on it. Sticking to the bus lane is often fine whereas trying to get round a stationary bus (or delivery vehicle) blocking the entire bus lane with nose-to-tail 40mph traffic passing a foot to its right preventing you getting around the blockage is less fine. Sticking to a bus lane to go left or take the &#34;AND BUSES&#34; straight-ahead option is fine whereas crossing a couple of lanes to get to a right-hand filter without the benefit of a red traffic light can sometimes be tricky if no-one wants to let you out. I assume OSM's junctions carry permissible-routing information but haven't looked to see if the differing easinesses of different manoeuvres can be attributed.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SRD on "Maps &#38; qualitative assessment"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2358#post-25088</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SRD</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25088@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;I DO agree that Harrison Road is exceptionally unpleasant.&#60;/em&#62;  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Especially for the drivers who have to contend with Spytfyre glaring at them (see old threads :)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Maps &#38; qualitative assessment"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2358#post-25076</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25076@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;I certainly don't know how anyone can describe it as &#34;quiet&#34;!&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The simple answer is a) OSM is inevitably subjective b) most roads are different at different times of the day - which doesn't help!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I DO agree that Harrison Road is exceptionally unpleasant.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Min on "Maps &#38; qualitative assessment"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2358#post-25071</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Min</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25071@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;It seems the only way to find out these things is to ride the route yourself which is unhelpful. I would also consider Harrison Road to be very hostile and as you have to ride up it to link from the Roseburn to the Towpath this is quite concering. I certainly don't know how anyone can describe it as &#34;quiet&#34;!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have also ridden on huge A roads and found them to be no problem at all. This is usually because they are so wide that even HGVs can pass with no difficulty and of course - blessing - no parked cars!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;But these things may just be subjective.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Maps &#38; qualitative assessment"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2358#post-25068</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25068@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;CycleStreets uses the data from &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.openstreetmap.org&#34;&#62;OpenStreetMap&#60;/a&#62; which &#60;strong&#62;anyone&#60;/strong&#62; can update/improve/add too.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Yeah the &#34;hostile&#34; is particularly unhelpful!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dave on "Maps &#38; qualitative assessment"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2358#post-25059</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25059@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think I've mentioned this before, but on the above subject last night's exploration reminded me of Cyclestreet's bizarre metric for route quality.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Take Harrison St - the ratrun linking the A70 to the far side of the canal. Every time I ride this I am concerned for drivers trying to scrape past, playing chicken with oncoming vehicles and cutting up bikes (especially uphill). Cyclestreets give it a top &#34;very quiet&#34; status on the quality-o-meter.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Then look at a busier road which, nonetheless, proves very agreeable for cycling. In extremis, I rode the A90 daily during the years I worked in Fife and *never* had any trouble. But as a more mundane example, consider riding the bus lanes on the A8 - about as agreeable as cycling can be, in many ways.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Cyclestreets tells us this is &#34;very hostile&#34;. Well, no. It is *busy* but while many would seek to avoid that, it is by no means *hostile* to share a bus lane with Lothian buses.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Does anyone else think this is weird? I'd have &#34;no through road / very quiet / quiet / average / busy / very busy / stationary&#34; as my quietness metric, and then &#34;friendly / agreeable / disagreeable / hostile&#34; as the quality metric.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
