<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 02:49:13 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>kaputnik on "Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2765#post-29691</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29691@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;Looks like the solitary voter is right&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Of course I am :D&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Speaking of Obree's &#34;Old Faithful&#34;, it was on Cycling Weekly yesterday that an enterprising Swede has built an updated replica out of wood and carbon (Obree's was steel and aluminium)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest/523473/faithful-to-old-faithful-obree-s-bike-recreated.html&#34;&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/imageBank/o/obreebike-Paragon_0011.jpg&#34;&#62;&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;His quest to get his knees ever-closer together was also why he used a cruciform frame design, so that there was no top tube to get in the way of his knees.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Personally I think the replica isn't a pretty sight. It's worth going to the top floor of the museum on Chambers Street to see the original. It still has a shoe bolted on to it.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Smudge on "Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2765#post-29670</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Smudge</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29670@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Looks like the solitary voter is right, simplest just to get some awsomepower and push the biggish gear lol :))
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>gembo on "Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2765#post-29654</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gembo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29654@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Of no use but slightly related- new Specialized Secteur has a SRAM chainset with what looks like big cog and then granny on the front (no middle cog)  34/50 chain ring and 11-32 cassette.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.edinburghbicycle.com/ebwPNLqrymode.a4p?f_ProductID=12987&#38;amp;f_SupersetQRY=C438&#38;amp;f_SortOrderID=1&#38;amp;f_bct=c003155c018341&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.edinburghbicycle.com/ebwPNLqrymode.a4p?f_ProductID=12987&#38;amp;f_SupersetQRY=C438&#38;amp;f_SortOrderID=1&#38;amp;f_bct=c003155c018341&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The SRAM chainset’s lower Q-factor (distance between the outside of the pedal holes) positions your feet closer together than would be possible with a triple chainset - the alternative route to wide-range gearing. A lower Q factor is reckoned to contribute to optimal pedalling and biomechanical efficiency. A lower Q factor is reckoned to contribute to optimal pedalling and biomechanical efficiency [so true they said it twice]. Low Q-factor was what motivated Specialized-sponsored rider Graeme Obree to famously raid his washing machine for low-profile bearings to create a shorter bottom bracket axle to minimize the distance between the cranks when building his hour record-breaking bike.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2765#post-29449</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29449@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;you might be limited there if you have a short reach dérailleur&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Yes, the 105 I've got will handle a 28T - but there have been many models over the years...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2765#post-29446</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29446@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I've asked this question in TBW before as I have the same crankset. Answer is you &#34;can&#34; just about squeeze a 37 on, but not less than that. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I think the cassette is your best option, but you might be limited there if you have a short reach dérailleur.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2765#post-29445</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29445@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;This might interest -&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.sheldonbrown.com/cribsheet-bcd.html&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.sheldonbrown.com/cribsheet-bcd.html&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Smudge on "Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2765#post-29443</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Smudge</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29443@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;'cause if a small front ring will go on it's probably cheaper? Fair point though!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2765#post-29441</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29441@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Why not put a wider ratio cassette on?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Smudge on "Non-compact Shimano 105 chainset, smallest inner ring?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=2765#post-29440</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Smudge</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29440@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Ok, I have a 52/38 on the front of my roadbike, and being weak and old I find that combined with a close ratio rear cassette can be kind of hard work after a few steep hills... given I'll be trekking down the A68 in a few weeks I wonder if anyone knows what the smallest inner ring is that'll fit on a Shimano 105 chainset?&#60;br /&#62;
Or where the best deal is on a compact!&#60;br /&#62;
Ta... :)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
