<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Two Wrongs Make a... Shrug...</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Two Wrongs Make a... Shrug...</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 03:08:03 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Wilmington&#039;s Cow on "Two Wrongs Make a... Shrug..."</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=3813#post-39946</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Wilmington&#039;s Cow</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">39946@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Heading up the Royal Mile this morning a black Ford Galaxy driver parked on the opposite side in the opposite direction waits patiently for the cars to go past up the hill... Before pulling out to execute a 3 point turn right in front of me.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have no idea if he saw me, bit at the end of the first 'point' he waves in acknowledgement of the fact I've (had to) stop rather abruptly (into a trackstand, easier uphill).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;He pulls back to the second point, at which stage spidey sense tingles and a hi-vizzed to the hilt muppet hares past my right, then swerves left to go round the front of the car just as he starts to execute point 3 (i.e. drive forward again to head on up the road). 'Swerve' is no exaggeration, and he's a lucky boy that the driver was paying attention and hauled on the brakes just as he'd started to move forward (I guess he managed to see one cyclist out of 2 this morning).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;He looks at me, and I just... shrug. I tried to imbue it with 'yes-he-was-stupid-but-remember-you-pulled-out-without-looking-initially-so-aren't-really-any-better. I'm not sure how much of that came across.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The reason I mention the hi-viz earlier is simply this. I'm happy for people to wear or not wear it as they see fit (just don't evangelise either way). But this guy was head-to-toe in hi-viz (including the 'hump' over his backpack) and so you have to assume, quite reasonably, that he was doing so as he believes it makes him visible and 'safer'. I always find it funny when someone dressed like that then rides in an utterly moronic manner. A bit like wearing a helmet then riding in the dark without lights.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
