<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;TfL tells cyclists to dismount on its roads&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;TfL tells cyclists to dismount on its roads&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 06:22:51 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Dave on "&#34;TfL tells cyclists to dismount on its roads&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=3916#post-40982</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40982@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Cyclists who fail to observe advisory signs: contributory negligence if an accident does happen? Makes sense if you're going to hold victims responsible for the injuries inflicted on them, why not for being there in the first place?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I suspect insurers already take this approach but it's not really visible because almost all claims settle out of court.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "&#34;TfL tells cyclists to dismount on its roads&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=3916#post-40969</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40969@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://cyclelondoncity.blogspot.com/2011/09/tfl-responds-to-cyclist-dismount-sign.html&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://cyclelondoncity.blogspot.com/2011/09/tfl-responds-to-cyclist-dismount-sign.html&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
