<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Another landmark to go(?)</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Another landmark to go(?)</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 17:01:40 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>chdot on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-61384</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">61384@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;Could&#60;/em&#62; make it slightly easier to re-open South Sub to passengers as number of freight trains was used as one reason for it being 'difficult' to run a frequent service.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-61373</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">61373@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I don't think anyone will mourn the loss of the 40-year old coal-burner that it is on the inside, but the building itself is a highly-regarded piece of modern architecture by Robert Matthew and will be a great shame to see it and the chimneys pulled down. Its half-sister at Kincardine came down in the mid-to-late nineties.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I doubt it would be deemed echonomical to keep the existing structure if the gas power station goes ahead.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wilmington&#039;s Cow on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-61353</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Wilmington&#039;s Cow</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">61353@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.scotsman.com/edinburgh-evening-news/edinburgh/cockenzie-power-plant-to-shut-down-1-2175741&#34;&#62;Shutting down next year&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42657</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42657@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;Does Natural Gas not give off carbon when burned then?&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Per unit of heat generated, brown coal emits 3 times as much CO2 as methane and black coal 2 times as much.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Levels of carbon monoxide from gas are about 1/8th for that of coal, NOxes are about 1/2 to a 1/3 of coal and sulphur dioxide is negligible. It also physically generates less flue gas and almost no particulate matter.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;A modern combined-cycle gas-turbine powered station (buring gas to turn a gas turbine, then capturing the waste heat to generate steam to turn a steam turbine) is also vastly more efficient than a 1960s coal station. You can get 50-60% thermal efficiency in optimal operating conditions for CCGT. Coal is about 30-35%.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So it's good all round in those respects. What the gas costs and where it comes from, that's another thing. Bear in mind a lot of the coal for Cockenzie is imported from Russia - getting it here is not a clean and efficient business.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>steveo on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42652</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>steveo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42652@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Not nearly as much, there are also less &#34;other&#34; environmental issues with gas.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>DaveC on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42651</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>DaveC</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42651@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;No the news said it was in line with agreements to reduce carbon, coal being a dirty fuel. Does Natural Gas not give off carbon when burned then?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;looking at the massive amount of water flowing under the forth bridges as i do most days, they ought to pus some tidal flow energy generation there. If fair hoons through at springs.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>steveo on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42649</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>steveo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42649@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;More likely the cost of the new carbon trading scheme means that coal is becoming less and less attractive even as the price of gas rises.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>alibali on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42648</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>alibali</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42648@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Probably a decision bolstered by the arrival of fracking, without which the supply of gas would depend on imports. Or maybe in-place gasification of coal that is still in the ground?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42642</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42642@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;they have their own beauty&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JnQ8d8yvZQ&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JnQ8d8yvZQ&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=cockenzie+power+station+lit+up#q=cockenzie+power+station+lit+up&#34;&#62;More videos&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>amir on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42639</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>amir</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42639@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;Subliminal navigation aid?&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;More than subliminal. You can even see the tops over the ridge in south East Lothian.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Also they have their own beauty though my wife disagrees on that.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>DaveC on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42636</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>DaveC</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42636@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;So its not being demolished then, just stripped out and new in-ards put in.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42633</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42633@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;I'll miss those chimneys.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So will I, but not sure why. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Subliminal navigation aid?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4099&#34;&#62;See other thread&#60;/a&#62;.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>amir on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42632</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>amir</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42632@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I'll miss those chimneys.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Another landmark to go(?)"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4098#post-42622</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42622@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.flickr.com/photos/chdot/5476704836/&#34;&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5215/5476704836_c4b1013871.jpg&#34;&#62;&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Cockenzie Power Station is set to shut and be rebuilt as gas instead of coal.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.eastlothiancourier.com/news/prestonpans/articles/2011/10/06/418146-government-green-light-for-new-power-stations-/&#34;&#62;The artist's impression&#60;/a&#62; seems to show that it will look pretty similar - but with smaller chimneys (which can be seen from many parts of Edinburgh.&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;center&#62;&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.flickr.com/photos/chdot/5305620867/&#34;&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5283/5305620867_bc461706f3_z.jpg&#34;&#62;&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/center&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
