<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: The Princes Street Missed Opportunity</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: The Princes Street Missed Opportunity</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 12:33:14 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>kaputnik on "The Princes Street Missed Opportunity"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4135#post-42998</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42998@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Yes there is a first time for everything for them to get something right!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Morningsider on "The Princes Street Missed Opportunity"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4135#post-42997</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Morningsider</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42997@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;All these diversions are likely to have been established by a temporary traffic regulation order (TTRO).  If this is the case and it restricts cycling on Princes Street then this sign will be correct.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I can't find a copy of the TTRO, so can't verify whether this is the case.  Someone at CEC should be able to verify this.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "The Princes Street Missed Opportunity"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4135#post-42996</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42996@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;It's RED. That means it's extra legal. Or so they probably think.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "The Princes Street Missed Opportunity"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4135#post-42995</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42995@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;That sign have ANY legality??
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wilmington&#039;s Cow on "The Princes Street Missed Opportunity"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4135#post-42994</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Wilmington&#039;s Cow</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42994@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Though it seems most are ignoring the signs, you do have to wonder why they don't technically allow cyclists to use this bit of Princes Street.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.flickr.com/photos/blackpuddinonnabike/6234125663/&#34;&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6177/6234125663_9c3096e8b9.jpg&#34;&#62;&#60;/a&#62;&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.flickr.com/photos/blackpuddinonnabike/6234125663/&#34;&#62;Missed opportunity&#60;/a&#62; by &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.flickr.com/people/blackpuddinonnabike/&#34;&#62;blackpuddinonnabike&#60;/a&#62;, on Flickr&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It's an 'emergency' lane. Though today it was also blocked off as railings were moved to allow a works truck to deposit a load. I'm pretty certain that's more difficult to move out of the way of an ambulance than a bike...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
