<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Cycling as an adventure sport</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Cycling as an adventure sport</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 18:59:35 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Roibeard on "Cycling as an adventure sport"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4935#post-52228</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Roibeard</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">52228@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://cycalogical.blogspot.com/2012/01/dangerous-sport-or-mode-of-transport.html&#34;&#62;CycaLogical on Dangerous Sport or Mode of Transport&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Although I'm a &#34;vehicular cyclist&#34; through experience and by necessity, and I don't really expect there will ever be separate infrastructure to all destinations, I don't want cycling thought of as an adventure sport - I use bikes for transporting my family!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The separationalists make good points too, and I'll use cycling infrastructure by preference when with the children, even if it takes longer (the kids aren't that fast anyway!).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Of course, as discussed in the &#34;why I don't cycle in Edinburgh&#34; topic, the trick would be to improve both infrastructure and the on road experience.  But how?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4931&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=4931&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Robert
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
