<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: No bicycles in top 100 brands</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: No bicycles in top 100 brands</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 18:59:37 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Claggy Cog on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53438</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Claggy Cog</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53438@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think it is based on numbers of the product sold as well as their stock market share prices, and bicycles are just not in that sort of league, and is all a bit niche.  I think Porche and MB sell more of their cars than any bike manufacturer sells in this automotive, alcohol, fashion, food, electronics, gizmo driven world.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53331</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53331@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;As a &#34;brand&#34;, based on image and how seriously they take themselves and that sort of thign (rather than just end product) things like Campagnolo jump to mind. And of course Rapha.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Claggy Cog on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53286</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Claggy Cog</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53286@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@cb, well they have been going a rather long time&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.schwinnbikes.com/gbr/company/timeline&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.schwinnbikes.com/gbr/company/timeline&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53276</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53276@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Brompton surely has to be there in the top cycling brands. It has brand recognition even amongst the non-cycling masses. Staying with British brands, Dawes still has a reputation to be proud of.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What about Sturmey Archer? ( I suppose see Raleigh above for historical kudos).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Dahon ought to be a contender, despite it's awkward name.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Baldcyclist on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53272</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Baldcyclist</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53272@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hmm, top 100 cycling brands...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;1. Raleigh (for what it has done, not where it is now!)&#60;br /&#62;
2. ...&#60;br /&#62;
3. ...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53266</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53266@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;The interesting (?) thing about a lot of those &#34;top brands&#34; is they use the brand image to sell you something that you don't need and won't make your life any better and may even make it worse! I guess that's what branding consultants are paid for!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Also there are no privately held companies in that list, and I think a lot of it is basically what their &#34;value&#34; on the stock market is. For instance, do they mean Coca Cola the drink, or the Coca Cola Corporation, which has many, many brands - a lot of which people don't associate with the company.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>cb on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53265</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53265@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;So if it were a bicycle specific top 100 who'd be in the top 10.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;wingpig suggests Shimano (above).  I'd have thought Trek, Cannondale, Specialized, Giant?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Folk on &#60;a href=&#34;http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060917011943AARWkFz&#34;&#62;Yahoo Answers&#60;/a&#62; (US specific) seem to suggest Schwinn - er, should I have heard of them?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53261</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53261@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;The Armani one is (of course) rather overpriced for what you get. It's basically a re-badged Electra cruiser. A similar spec without Armani branding is about a third of the price. But then I suppose a similar spec suit or turtle neck sweater without that branding.....blimey, next I'll be saying buy a cheap PC instead of an Apple computer.*&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;* No way! The immortal Jobs reality distortion field lives on. Macintosh forever!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53260</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53260@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;You mean the direct, straight line relationship between how much a city &#60;em&#62;is&#60;/em&#62; Copenhagen and much a city is &#60;em&#62;like&#60;/em&#62; Copenhagen?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>wingpig on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53257</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wingpig</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53257@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;In the same way that Intel are above Dell you'd almost expect Shimano or one of those other multi-component-producing brands to be far above any specific frame-compiler.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;On a similar off-topic, does anyone remember that infographic from last year which essentially showed that Copenhagen was the Copenhagiest Copenhagen?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>steveo on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53256</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>steveo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53256@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Job for stephdoh?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53255</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53255@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;and expensive&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So long as your non-cycle-specific clothes cost more than your bike, that is fine by the cyclechic manifesto. I presume Mr Copenhagenize has an €1,801 coat to justify his €1,800 Bullitt cargo bike...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.flickr.com/photos/16nine/5351606412/&#34;&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5122/5351606412_108d0c40ef.jpg&#34;&#62;&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>kaputnik on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53253</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53253@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;The &#34;Top 100 brands&#34;, as paid for by the branding industry. Or &#34;your brand isn't in here, this is why you need to pay us more money&#34;.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53250</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53250@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;The Armani bike looks a bit more practical, dare I say &#60;em&#62;Citizen Cyclist&#60;/em&#62; ® than the Beamer, which just looks a bit silly and &#60;em&#62;expensive&#60;/em&#62;.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>alibali on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53245</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>alibali</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53245@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/bmw-to-sell-m-series-bicycle-25481/&#34;&#62;Not stricly true...&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I think a few of the others have tried to broaden their appeal with branded bikes too.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.profilebrighton.co.uk/emporio-armani-ea7-cruiser-bicycle.html&#34;&#62;For example....&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "No bicycles in top 100 brands"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5017#post-53238</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53238@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Though Harley-Davidson is 100&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Ford is 50&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Four car cos in top 20&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-16/coca-cola-retains-title-as-world-s-most-valuable-brand-table-.html&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-16/coca-cola-retains-title-as-world-s-most-valuable-brand-table-.html&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
