<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Off-road cycle route planning?</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Off-road cycle route planning?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 05:55:42 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>wingpig on "Off-road cycle route planning?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5139#post-54834</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wingpig</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">54834@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hmmm. I just got CycleStreets to use it by picking very obvious start and end points and choosing the &#60;a href=&#34;http://cycle.st/j1546097 - Balgreen Road to Trinity Crescent&#34;&#62;quietest&#60;/a&#62; option... maybe the section-by-section routing algorithm will only use it if it chances upon it, whereas humanbrains tend to think in big purple lines... (as stated above whilst I was fiddling about pasting in the route URL)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Off-road cycle route planning?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5139#post-54833</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">54833@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;CycleStreets quiet routes generally use as many off-road paths as possible but there will be times when the algorithms behind the web site think that some routes may be too much of a deviation even though they may be fine to real people. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Of course CS depends on data from OpenStreetMap. If (extreme case) a motorway is marked as a minor road, CS might plot a route along it!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I don't know if the WoL path is still blocked around Balgreen (I assume so) or if OSM has the blockages recorded in the current data.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SRD on "Off-road cycle route planning?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5139#post-54831</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SRD</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">54831@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;In response to &#60;a href=&#34;http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5138#post-54825&#34;&#62;query on another thread&#60;/a&#62;, I tried to generate  cyclestreets routes for Balgreen to Botanics and Balgreen to Cramond, but in neither case did Cylce streets give me a route using the NEPN.  Any suggestions / advice? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Is it just me? Ie would no one else think that those are sensible routes to do? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Maybe Cylcestreets needs a 'leisure cycling' option, along with a 'commute/transport' option. Or one which maximizes off-road?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
