<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;A Guide to Controlling Access on Paths&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;A Guide to Controlling Access on Paths&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 23:03:26 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>kaputnik on "&#34;A Guide to Controlling Access on Paths&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5959#post-63662</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kaputnik</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">63662@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Heh. Photo 5 (page 25) at Caldercruix. Ruggtomcat and I negotiated that one on the infamous Giro Centralbeltia. The whole (brand new) path was full of such pitiful barriers and chicanery.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I really dislike those A and K-frame things. I'm glad that the manual agrees with me on this. Fortunately there aren't too many of them around these parts.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "&#34;A Guide to Controlling Access on Paths&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=5959#post-63641</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">63641@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;Assessing the need for and implementing appropriate access controls&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.sustrans.org.uk/assets/files/design%20and%20construction/Access%20Control%20Guide%20Jan%202012.pdf&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.sustrans.org.uk/assets/files/design%20and%20construction/Access%20Control%20Guide%20Jan%202012.pdf&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Long technical document (with pix) useful for assessing whether existing 'obstacles' (barriers/chicanes/etc.) are necessary and well designed.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
