<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Bike Friendly city award for Bristol</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Bike Friendly city award for Bristol</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 19:03:57 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Kim on "Bike Friendly city award for Bristol"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=609#post-4969</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4969@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/transport-environment/glasgow-cycling-facilities-among-worst-in-the-uk-1.1018331&#34;&#62;The Heralds&#60;/a&#62; take on the story. I think it is more a reflection of C+'s readership.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Bike Friendly city award for Bristol"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=609#post-4968</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4968@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;high casualty rate of 172 per 1000 commuters&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;er&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I hope not..???
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Min on "Bike Friendly city award for Bristol"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=609#post-4966</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Min</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4966@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Greenways + Innocent are definately what make my commute bearable. I sometimes approach work from a different route which has no greenways and that is pretty grim.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>PS on "Bike Friendly city award for Bristol"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=609#post-4964</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PS</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4964@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Edinburgh came 5th. I've only read half the article so far, and the only mention of Edinburgh has been the high casualty rate of 172 per 1000 commuters (over 8 times that of Leicester, apparently). No idea how they worked that out, though. Oh, and we've got lots of traffic-free greenways
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "Bike Friendly city award for Bristol"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=609#post-4954</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4954@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;br /&#62;
As another cycling forum commenter argued: &#34;Deciding which UK city is best for cycling is a bit like deciding which one of Jedward is the more talented.&#34;&#60;br /&#62;
&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Wonderful!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So who has seen Cycling Plus so we know where Edinburgh came?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SRD on "Bike Friendly city award for Bristol"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=609#post-4952</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SRD</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4952@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Bike Friendly city award for Bristol, but still they complain....&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/apr/04/bristol-most-bike-friendly-city&#34;&#62;as reported in the Guardian anyway&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
