<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Why are only motorists warned of road closures?</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: Why are only motorists warned of road closures?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 19:02:36 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Uberuce on "Why are only motorists warned of road closures?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=6527#post-70177</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Uberuce</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70177@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I almost tweeted an apology in the Southsider on April the 28th: &#60;em&#62;Sorry to any cyclists inconvenienced by today's event...oh wait: there's none of you&#60;/em&#62; but decided it was too mean spirited. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;That thought does mean I'm not fussed by lack of disruption warning to cyclists. Worst that can happen is we push for a sidestreet's distance and then get on with it.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>wingpig on "Why are only motorists warned of road closures?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=6527#post-70174</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wingpig</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70174@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Motorists are also being warned to plan their journeys in advance for some sort of football final cup procession bus waving thing in a week or so.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>custard on "Why are only motorists warned of road closures?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=6527#post-70171</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>custard</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70171@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;no buses through there,but onto the Western approach (including the excellent 22 service the tram 'replaces')&#60;br /&#62;
howeve no doubt it will disrupt through increased traffic volume going straight.&#60;br /&#62;
For bus users its usually the case the bus reroutes. though i did once stand at a suspended stop on Princes Steet :o in the early AM and watch my bus fly by!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wilmington&#039;s Cow on "Why are only motorists warned of road closures?"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=6527#post-70165</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Wilmington&#039;s Cow</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70165@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I've pondered this before - the reporting on the latest tram works says that '&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.scotsman.com/edinburgh-evening-news/edinburgh/disruption-warning-as-tram-work-set-to-enter-next-phase-1-2289033&#34;&#62;motorists are being warned of road closures&#60;/a&#62;'. What of bus users on the same route (are there buses use that street?). I would imagine that pedestrians won't be able to use the street either. And, of course, cyclists.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
