<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Bike commuting by the numbers in the top U.S. bike-friendly cities&#34;</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</link>
<description>CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Bike commuting by the numbers in the top U.S. bike-friendly cities&#34;</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 13:56:57 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>crowriver on "&#34;Bike commuting by the numbers in the top U.S. bike-friendly cities&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=7421#post-76781</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76781@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Traffic planning in most cities is based on the congestion which in many places only manifests itself at peak commuting times. Therefore the commuting modal share is an important indicator.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Of course, a high proportion (40% +?) of car journeys are for leisure purposes, so the planning model doesn't really factor in overall usage of cars either. Hence flawed practices such as bus and cycle lanes only operating during peak times...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Roibeard on "&#34;Bike commuting by the numbers in the top U.S. bike-friendly cities&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=7421#post-76763</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Roibeard</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76763@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think there's a difference between modal share for commuting and for general use - I've seen some bemoan a city being lower than it &#34;should&#34; because cycle commuting wasn't big in the city, but everyday cycling was big.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Think about the demographics too - you could score well in commuting with fast, confident, on-road cyclists (insert usual stereotype here), but if children, parents and older folks (insert &#34;indicator species&#34; stereotype here) did their errands by bike it wouldn't impact your score, despite suggesting a much more cycle-friendly city.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Robert
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "&#34;Bike commuting by the numbers in the top U.S. bike-friendly cities&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=7421#post-76754</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76754@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Interesting though that Portland is only 3.9%. Portland, the cycling nirvana of Norte Americano. Edinburgh, take a bow, our modal share trounces Portland! But, where is San Francisco? Or Berkeley? Surely these places all have reasonable cycling modal share?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Figures for California are quite impressive. No infographic with photo of hipster on a fixie though:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.cyclelicio.us/2011/california-bicycle-mode-share/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.cyclelicio.us/2011/california-bicycle-mode-share/&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>crowriver on "&#34;Bike commuting by the numbers in the top U.S. bike-friendly cities&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=7421#post-76751</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crowriver</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76751@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;To be fair, the blog says North American cities.....you can't expect Twitter users to think about what they're tweeting. ;-)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SRD on "&#34;Bike commuting by the numbers in the top U.S. bike-friendly cities&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=7421#post-76746</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SRD</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76746@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Toronto and Vancouver weren't US cities last time I checked.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chdot on "&#34;Bike commuting by the numbers in the top U.S. bike-friendly cities&#34;"</title>
<link>http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=7421#post-76744</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chdot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76744@http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Maria Popova (@brainpicker)&#60;br /&#62;
03/07/2012 01:40&#60;br /&#62;
Bike commuting by the numbers in the top U.S. bike-friendly cities – though, wow, dishearteningly low &#60;a href=&#34;http://j.mp/NqC2E1&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://j.mp/NqC2E1&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
